Trial reportESMO open2026
EV-103 dose escalation/cohort A: 5-year follow-up of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in previously untreated locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study of Enfortumab Vedotin (ASG-22CE) as Monotherapy or in Combination With Other Anticancer Therapies for the Treatment of Urothelial Cancer
An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Phase 3 Study of Enfortumab Vedotin in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDose escalation/cohort A of the phase Ib/II EV-103/KEYNOTE-869 study (NCT03288545) assessed safety and efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab (P) in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). Here we report updated results after 5 years of follow-up.
methodsPatients received EV 1.25 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8, and pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 of every 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. Select secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
resultsForty-five patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were representative of a cisplatin-ineligible population; 84.4% had visceral disease and 55.6% had reduced renal function (creatine clearance <60 ml/min). The median follow-up time was 62.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 59.4-63.1]. There were no new safety signals, and safety was consistent with EV+P in other la/mUC studies. Confirmed ORR was 73.3%, median DOR was 22.1 months [95% CI 8.4-not estimable (NE)], median PFS was 12.7 months (95% CI 6.1-NE), and median OS was 26.1 months (95% CI 15.5-NE). The estimated 5-year survival rate was 41.5% (95% CI 26.5-56.0).
conclusionAlong with results from EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39 (NCT04223856), the 5-year results further support the sustained benefit from EV+P and establish the combination as the standard of care for previously untreated la/mUC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.