Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42155309›Full record

ArticleVision research2026

The visual perks of (not) being a wallflower: sociality is a stronger predictor of individual differences in face recognition than childhood experiences.

Spencer T Andrews, Maleah J Carter, Shruti Japee, Chris I Baker, J Brendan Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Spencer T AndrewsHarvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Maleah J CarterDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shruti JapeeSection on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Chris I BakerSection on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Brendan RitchieSection on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada. Electronic address: brendan.ritchie@uleth.ca.

Funding

Object, face, body and scene representations in the human brainZIAMH002909 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BAKER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2025
$25.5M
Functional Anatomy of Face Processing in the Primate BrainZIAMH002918 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI UNGERLEIDER, LESLIE G · 2009 to 2021
$23.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002909Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals vary considerably in their ability to recognize faces. Such variability may in part reflect individual differences in exposure to faces based on the number or diversity of faces that are available to be seen in the environment. To investigate this possibility, a series of studies have used hometown size as a proxy for individual variation in face exposure and investigated whether it predicts individual differences in face recognition ability, with mixed results. In particular, it was previously found that performance on face recognition tasks was predicted by hometown size, but only for male participants. In three experiments, we sought to revisit whether hometown size predicts face recognition ability, using an order of magnitude larger sample sizes (from N = ∼90 increased to N = ∼ 900), while also considering a variety of other predictors related to childhood experience (e.g. neighborhood type and family composition) and adult sociality, including personality, social intelligence, and shyness. Across all experiments, we found that hometown size was a poor predictor of adult face recognition ability compared to other predictors related to childhood experience. In addition, of the different measures related to sociality, social awareness was a comparatively strong predictor of individual differences in face recognition ability.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionIndividualityRecognition, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMalePersonalityPhotic StimulationYoung AdultFace recognitionIndividual differencesPersonalitySocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID42155309
PMCPMC13252829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.