ArticleVision research2026
The visual perks of (not) being a wallflower: sociality is a stronger predictor of individual differences in face recognition than childhood experiences.
Article in Vision research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals vary considerably in their ability to recognize faces. Such variability may in part reflect individual differences in exposure to faces based on the number or diversity of faces that are available to be seen in the environment. To investigate this possibility, a series of studies have used hometown size as a proxy for individual variation in face exposure and investigated whether it predicts individual differences in face recognition ability, with mixed results. In particular, it was previously found that performance on face recognition tasks was predicted by hometown size, but only for male participants. In three experiments, we sought to revisit whether hometown size predicts face recognition ability, using an order of magnitude larger sample sizes (from N = ∼90 increased to N = ∼ 900), while also considering a variety of other predictors related to childhood experience (e.g. neighborhood type and family composition) and adult sociality, including personality, social intelligence, and shyness. Across all experiments, we found that hometown size was a poor predictor of adult face recognition ability compared to other predictors related to childhood experience. In addition, of the different measures related to sociality, social awareness was a comparatively strong predictor of individual differences in face recognition ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.