Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42155099›Full record

ArticlePest management science2026

Pheromone-based mating disruption of the tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa, in Camellia japonica street trees.

Seongchae Jung, Junheon Kim, Young Un Kim, Ki Bong Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seongchae Jung *AD Corp, Andong, Republic of Korea.
Junheon Kim *Forest Entomology and Pathology Division, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5204-3369
Young Un KimAD Corp, Andong, Republic of Korea.
Ki Bong KwonAD Corp, Andong, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Institue of Forest Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa, is a nuisance and defoliating pest of Camellia japonica, widely planted as street and windbreak trees. Pheromone-based mating disruption (MD) is a low-hazard alternative for urban settings; however, its performance in tall, dense canopies remains elusive. Herein, we investigated seasonal flight activity, vertical flight distribution and MD efficacy across 3 years (2023-2025) in roadside C. japonica stands in Jeju, Republic of Korea.

resultsPheromone monitoring of male moths showed two distinct flight periods per year. Furthermore, racemic 10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate consistently attracted males. Male capture inhibition (MCI) was 34.8% when MD dispensers were deployed only at 1.5 m. Contrastingly, vertically distributing dispensers within the canopy (≈1, 3 and 5 m) increased MCI to 84.2-95.8% across subsequent trials. In 2025, leaf damage was decreased from 10.5% (control) to 2.0% (MD), corresponding to 81.0% damage reduction. Dispensers released pheromone for >60 days, whereas each male flight period lasted for ≈30 days. This indicates potential for decreasing pheromone loading to enhance cost-efficiency without compromising disruption.

conclusionMD can effectively suppress E. pseudoconspersa in tall C. japonica street-tree systems when dispensers are deployed at several canopy heights. Optimizing dispenser loading and enhancing deployment technologies (e.g. assisted canopy installation) may further improve feasibility in urban and forest environments. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

CamelliaMothsPest Control, BiologicalSex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsMaleRepublic of KoreaSex Attractantsmale capture inhibition(R)‐10,14‐dimethylpentadecyl isobutyratestreet treeurban forest

Identifiers

PMID42155099
PMCPMC13453179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.