ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026
Broadband Access and Ophthalmologist Density in the United States: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Rural US communities experience disproportionately high rates of visual disability yet have limited access to ophthalmologists. Teleophthalmology may help address these gaps, but its effectiveness depends on broadband connectivity. The relationship between broadband access and ophthalmologist density has not been well characterized. Objective: The aim of this study is to quantify the association between household broadband access-defined as subscription rates or connection prevalence-and county-level ophthalmologist density and to identify sociodemographic predictors of access. Methods: We conducted an ecological study of all 3141 US counties using 2019 data from the American Community Survey, Area Health Resources File, and National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Broadband access was the primary exposure; ophthalmologist count with county population as an offset was the outcome. The primary analysis used negative binomial regression, adjusting for urbanicity, income, education, age, sex, race/ethnicity, unemployment, and insurance status. Sensitivity analyses included population-weighted linear regression and state fixed effects models. County-level heatmaps illustrated geographic patterns. Results: Median household broadband access was 56.6%, ranging from 72.2% in the most urban counties (NCHS category 1) to 49.1% in the most rural (NCHS category 6). In unadjusted negative binomial regression, each 10-percentage-point increase in broadband access was associated with a 68% higher ophthalmologist rate (incidence rate ratio=1.68, 95% CI 1.61-1.76; P<.001). After adjustment, each 10-percentage-point increase was associated with a 46% higher rate (incidence rate ratio=1.46, 95% CI 1.37-1.56; P<.001). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with primary analysis. Regions with both low broadband access and zero ophthalmologist density were concentrated in the South, Mountain West region, and Alaska. Conclusions: Broadband access is strongly associated with ophthalmologist availability across US counties, independent of sociodemographic factors. Areas lacking ophthalmologists also tend to lack broadband adoption, creating compounded barriers to both in-person and teleophthalmic care. Efforts to expand broadband may support more equitable access to vision services in underserved regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.