ArticleFamily practice2026
Concordance analysis of common hand pathology referrals from primary care to plastic surgery: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Family practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHand conditions are commonly referred from primary care to plastic surgery; however, no prior studies have assessed diagnostic concordance between family physicians and plastic surgeons.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and agreement of referring diagnoses for common hand pathologies.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 141 adult referrals from family physicians to plastic surgery for hand conditions at a tertiary care center over a 1-year period. Referrals were classified into five categories: correct, incorrect, missed main diagnosis, missed other diagnoses, and vague. Diagnostic accuracy and concordance were evaluated using descriptive statistics, Cohen's kappa (κ), and Gwet's AC1.
resultsAmong 141 patients, 142 referring diagnoses and 167 final diagnoses were recorded. Carpal tunnel syndrome (29.9%) and Dupuytren's disease (13.8%) were the most common referrals. Overall diagnostic concordance was substantial (κ = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.73). Concordance was highest for carpal tunnel syndrome and Dupuytren's disease (both κ = 0.88), and lower for trigger finger (κ = 0.69), ganglions (κ = 0.53), and first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (κ = 0.52). Diagnostic accuracy of family physicians was 70.7%. Most diagnoses were made clinically by the plastic surgeon at the initial consultation.
conclusionDiagnostic concordance between family physicians and plastic surgeons was substantial. While carpal tunnel syndrome and Dupuytren's disease showed high agreement, lower concordance for other hand conditions highlights opportunities for focused educational tools to improve diagnostic precision in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.