ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese of the 35 navigation metrics developed by the Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators (AONN+).
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo perform the translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese of the 35 navigation metrics developed by the Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators (AONN+).
methodsThis study employed a methodological approach for cross-cultural adaptation. Following authorization from the authors of the original version of the 35 metrics for evaluating navigation programs, the instrument was translated in accordance with established guidelines. A committee of ten experts was formed to review and reach consensus on the translation. The snowball sampling technique was used to recruit 35 judges, including nurse navigator and oncology nurses, with the aim of assessing the applicability of the metrics to the Brazilian context. The data were collected in the first semester of 2025.
resultsThe expert committee evaluated whether the metrics achieved semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence. Three rounds of evaluation were required to reach a 90% agreement rate. In the subsequent pretest, Brazilian oncology nurses and nurse navigators individually assessed each metric for cultural comprehensibility and applicability. The instrument's mean content validity index was 0.97.
conclusionThe 35 metrics were adapted and refined in accordance with the proportions of agreement and content validity index, which reached values consistent with those recommended for adequacy. Therefore, the translation enables the use of standardized navigation metrics to measure program outcomes in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.