ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Use of the OSCE in assessing performance in first aid of high school students.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the knowledge and performance of high school students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and foreign body airway obstruction management using an objective structured clinical examination.
methodsAn interventional design was implemented with high school students, who were assessed before and after the intervention. Participants completed a theoretical questionnaire and two objective structured clinical examinations-one for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and one for foreign body airway obstruction-before receiving theoretical and practical first aid training. Subsequent assessments included the same theoretical questionnaire and objective structured clinical examinations, administered immediately after training and again after six months to measure knowledge retention.
resultsComparison of pre-training, immediate post-training, and six-month follow-up data revealed significant improvements in knowledge and performance across all student groups and scenarios (p<0.001), with sustained retention over time. Implications for School Health Policy, Practice, and Equity: Utilizing handmade mannequins alongside the objective structured clinical examination methodology offers a cost-effective approach for training students and mitigating adverse outcomes in high schools.
conclusionThe objective structured clinical examination is an effective and evaluative tool for first aid training among high school students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.