Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154841›Full record

SynthesisRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2026

Treatment of brucellosis in pregnant women: a systematic review and analysis of current gaps and future perspectives.

Endi Lanza Galvão, Diêgo Mendes Xavier, Glaciele Maria de Souza, Gláucia Cota, Sarah Nascimento Silva

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Endi Lanza GalvãoFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto René Rachou, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Grupo de Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5648-3932
Diêgo Mendes XavierUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8278-3536
Glaciele Maria de SouzaUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3303-072X
Gláucia CotaFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto René Rachou, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Grupo de Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0538-7403
Sarah Nascimento SilvaFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto René Rachou, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Grupo de Pesquisa Clínica e Políticas Públicas em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1087-9819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human brucellosis is a globally prevalent bacterial disease with significant implications during pregnancy due to obstetric complications. Despite the importance of early diagnosis and treatment, the lack of therapeutic consensus and robust evidence underscores the need for systematic evaluation to guide clinical practice. This study systematically reviewed the literature to identify and summarize available drug therapy options for brucellosis in pregnant women, focusing on efficacy, safety, and obstetric outcomes. The review followed PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and gray literature for references indexed up to September 15, 2025. Eligible studies reported therapeutic interventions in pregnant women with brucellosis. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tool, and data on participants, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Of 737 records screened, six studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising retrospective and prospective reports published between 1991 and 2020, totaling 403 pregnant women. Therapeutic regimens varied, with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP) plus rifampicin being the most frequently used combination. Adverse obstetric outcomes associated with this regimen occurred in 16% (95%CI: 8%-30%) of cases. Overall, abortion occurred in 94 (23.3%) women, 20 preterm births were reported, and 10 newborns had low birth weight. Recurrence was observed in only 3% of cases. Heterogeneity in outcomes and definitions limited comparability. In conclusion, there is no standardized treatment for brucellosis during pregnancy. Adverse obstetric outcomes remain frequent, highlighting the need for controlled studies to establish safe and effective therapeutic protocols.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBrucellosisPregnancy Complications, InfectiousFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRifampinTreatment OutcomeTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifampinTrimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID42154841
PMCPMC13185525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.