ArticleCBE life sciences education2026
Maximizing the Value of Learning Assistants for Students' Belonging, Mattering, and Confidence in Gateway STEM Courses.
Article in CBE life sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning Assistants (LAs) can reduce psychosocial barriers in gateway science courses. In this study, we specify the impact on students from different demographic groups. An inductive analysis of group interviews with 33 students from introductory biology and general chemistry courses revealed six narratives that capture students' experiences with course structures, people, and personal connections. All students valued varied, flexible resources, but other narratives differed across groups. Underrepresented racial/ethnic and first-generation students described active and collaborative learning as promoting belonging, confidence, and mattering. Instructor interactions were helpful, with underrepresented and first-generation students highlighting the importance of establishing course climate. LAs were crucial for belonging among underrepresented students, first-generation students, and continuing-generation women, but not for continuing-generation men. Shared academic identities were universally important, while shared gender and racial identities held greater significance for underrepresented and first-generation students. Experiences with peers varied, with negative peer interactions and fear of judgment having less impact on well-represented, continuing-generation students. These findings extend Dewsbury's Deep Teaching model by demonstrating how LA integration into STEM courses can support student experiences across diverse populations. The results also reveal how instructors and LA programs can adapt their practices to support all students, ultimately enhancing belonging, confidence, and mattering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.