Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154768›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Distinct endometrial protein profiles in spontaneous and stimulated cycles in women with poor ovarian response: A prospective case-crossover clinical trial.

Dzhamilyat Abdulkhalikova, Helena Ban Frangež, Tanja Burnik Papler, Martin Štimpfel, Eda Vrtačnik Bokal, Vesna Šalamun

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06804174 (Distinct Endometrial Protein Profiles in Spontaneous and Stimulated Cycles in Women With Poor Ovarian Respons), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06804174 nacompletednot on this map

Distinct Endometrial Protein Profiles in Spontaneous and Stimulated Cycles in Women With Poor Ovarian Respons

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled15ConditionsProteomeArmsuse of gonadotropins
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dzhamilyat AbdulkhalikovaDepartment of Human Reproduction, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Helena Ban FrangežDepartment of Human Reproduction, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tanja Burnik PaplerUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Martin ŠtimpfelDepartment of Human Reproduction, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eda Vrtačnik BokalDepartment of Human Reproduction, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vesna ŠalamunDepartment of Human Reproduction, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5043-4884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The window of implantation is a critical period for embryo implantation. Ovarian stimulation can disrupt endometrial receptivity, potentially through altered gene expression and downstream protein profiles. However, the impact on the endometrial proteome remains underexplored. Identifying biomarkers of endometrial receptivity may provide an opportunity to develop targeted interventions aimed at improving implantation outcomes. This prospective, case-crossover, open-label study was conducted at the Department of Human Reproduction, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, from September 2023 to June 2024. The study included 15 women aged <43 years with primary infertility and poor ovarian response. Endometrial samples were collected using a pipelle biopsy during the window of implantation in spontaneous and stimulated cycles and analyzed using protein microarrays targeting 1,466 proteins. Differential protein abundance was assessed using a multi-factorial linear model, including patient-specific effects as an additional factor to account for the paired case-crossover design. Effect sizes are reported as log2-fold changes with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Differential abundance was defined a priori as |log2FC| > 0.5 with FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05. Comparison of endometrial samples from spontaneous and stimulated cycles revealed 114 antibodies with differential abundance. Key proteins were associated with immune response (IL-8, proteins S100-A8 and S100-A9, CAMP) and extracellular matrix remodeling (MMP-9). Exploratory KEGG pathway mapping suggested involvement of immune and inflammatory pathways, including cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction and IL-17 signaling. Cluster analysis demonstrated distinct proteomic patterns, with all stimulated-cycle samples showing alterations and a subset of stimulated-cycle samples (40%) exhibiting more pronounced changes. The findings indicate that ovarian stimulation is associated with measurable alterations in the endometrial proteomic profile during the window of implantation. These changes may be relevant to biological pathways involved in endometrial receptivity and implantation. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to validate the identified candidate markers and determine their clinical relevance for implantation outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06804174.

Indexed as

EndometriumInfertility, FemaleOvulation InductionProteomeAdultBiomarkersCross-Over StudiesEmbryo ImplantationFemaleHumansProspective StudiesProteomicsBiomarkersProteome

Identifiers

PMID42154768
PMCPMC13186353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.