Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154765›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Heterogeneous biological graph convolutional network for drug-target interaction prediction.

Haoran Zhu, Jianjia Wang, Zhen Hua, Chaoqun Wang, Zimu Zhang, Tong Yu, Ling Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haoran ZhuSchool of AI and Advanced Computing, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2924-6480
Jianjia WangSchool of AI and Advanced Computing, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1983-1632
Zhen HuaSchool of AI and Advanced Computing, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Chaoqun WangSchool of AI and Advanced Computing, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Zimu ZhangSchool of AI and Advanced Computing, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Tong YuSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Ling GeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Huaibei People's Hospital, Huaibei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-target interaction prediction plays a critical role in drug discovery by identifying potential therapeutic targets and elucidating underlying molecular mechanisms. However, existing computational methods generally rely on limited biological modalities and inadequately capture heterogeneous associations. To overcome these limitations, we propose a Heterogeneous Biological Graph Convolutional Network (HBGCN) that employs a hierarchical graph propagation architecture to integrate multimodal biological information and learn homogeneous and heterogeneous representations for drug-target interaction prediction. By incorporating both direct and indirect meta-paths, HBGCN captures complex relational dependencies among diverse biological entities. Experimental results demonstrate that HBGCN achieves competitive performance on benchmark datasets. Case studies indicate that HBGCN effectively identifies therapeutic drug candidates and reveals proteins and gene expression patterns associated with drug regulation. The source code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Saxon0918/HBGCN.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug DiscoveryAlgorithmsGraph Neural NetworksHumans

Identifiers

PMID42154765
PMCPMC13186373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.