ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Autistic adults' experiences of accessing and receiving mental health care and their priorities for improvements: A qualitative study.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autistic adults are disproportionately affected by mental health conditions yet face significant barriers in accessing support and receiving suitable care. To understand this disparity better, using qualitative methods, we investigated the experiences of autistic adults in accessing and receiving mental health care and their priorities for improvement. Thirteen autistic adults with experience of mental health services in England were purposively selected to participate in semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis principles guided the analysis of interview transcripts. Participants felt that an understanding of autism was key for professionals to provide effective support, and reported this was often lacking, resulting in insufficient recognition for their autism-specific needs, feelings of neglect and inadequate treatment. Inconsistent services, including varying appointments and unfamiliar professionals exacerbated anxiety and hindered treatment benefits. A recurring theme of validation emerged as participants expressed a shared sense of not being believed or taken seriously within the context of mental health support. In terms of priorities for improving services, adaptability was a central focus, while better understanding and addressing the specific needs of autistic people was considered crucial. Participants - females in particular - emphasised the need for professionals to adopt more effective communication strategies as they felt that poor communication and misunderstandings often delayed autism diagnoses. To enhance mental health support for autistic adults and mitigate negative outcomes, increasing mental health professionals' understanding of autism is vital. Further research is needed to understand the manifestations and risk factors of mental health conditions in autistic adults. Participants stressed that autistic people need to be directly involved in driving these priorities and guiding the enhancement and adaptation of mental health care to meet their needs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.