Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154751›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The impact of new urbanization on "quantity increase and quality improvement" of urban green innovation.

Liang Fang, Chengxiang Li, Chen Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liang FangSchool of Economics and Management, Huangshan University, Huangshan City, Anhui Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7810-2237
Chengxiang LiSchool of Management, Anhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu City, Anhui Province, China.
Chen JinSchool of Economics and Management, Huangshan University, Huangshan City, Anhui Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8309-9883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise of new urbanization (NEU) as a major national strategy, a proposition with both theoretical and practical significance has been highlighted. Whether the implementation of this strategy can substantially enhance the quantity and quality of urban green innovation (GI) remains a focus of ongoing attention from the government and academia. Based on panel data from 284 cities from 2011 to 2022, this study constructs two-way fixed-effects models and multivariate moderation models, and empirically analyzes the effect of NEU on the "quantity increase" and "quality improvement" of urban GI. The study finds that the coefficients for NEU's impact on "quantity increase" and "quality improvement" of urban GI are statistically significant at the 0.01 level, with positive signs indicating enhancement effects. The moderating effect indicates that the coupling interaction between digital inclusive finance and various elements (government technology support, informatization, regional economic development, energy consumption) constitutes a gain mechanism, effectively strengthening the marginal effect of increases in the quantity and quality of urban GI. Threshold effect analysis indicates that the government's green support exerts a threshold effect on NEU's influence on urban GI. The paper not only deepens the understanding of the NEU dividend release mechanism but also provides operational policy implications for coordinating the two key agendas of NEU construction and GI development.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesQuality ImprovementUrbanizationCitiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID42154751
PMCPMC13186382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.