ArticlePloS one2026
A computational text analysis of recent African digital health strategies and their attention to vulnerable populations.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital health offers opportunities to transform healthcare systems and improve access to care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. However, there is concern that national digital health strategies may inadequately address the needs of vulnerable populations, risking the reinforcement of existing health inequalities.
objectiveThis study investigates the extent to which recent African national digital health strategies consider and prioritize vulnerable populations particularly at risk of digital exclusion (women, children and the elderly).
methodsWe conducted a computational text analysis of 13 recent national digital health strategy documents from African countries to identify major topical priorities within the strategies and to systematically assess the frequency and context of references to vulnerable populations.
resultsMost strategies focus on broad goals such as health system strengthening, infrastructure development, and stakeholder coordination. While there are mentions of women and children, these references are often indirect and not accompanied by concrete plans or dedicated actions. References to the elderly are especially rare. Few strategies include specific measures to ensure digital inclusion or equity for these vulnerable populations.
conclusionsRecent African digital health strategies currently prioritize systemic and infrastructural development, but the needs of vulnerable populations are often overlooked or superficially addressed. To prevent the digital divide from widening, national strategies should embed explicit equity targets, actionable plans, and mechanisms for meaningful inclusion and participation of all population groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.