ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
The Implementation of the Toolbox "Talk About Pain-Take Action Together" to Improve Musculoskeletal Pain Management in the Workplace.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a leading cause of sickness absence from work and early retirement. While structured workplace dialogues about musculoskeletal pain are recommended, their implementation remains challenging. This study explored the implementation of the 'Talk About Pain-Take Action Together'' toolbox in two Danish public workplaces.
methodsQualitative observational implementation study informed by reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Two workplaces with physically demanding roles were included: one with researcher-initiated implementation during the study period and one with internally initiated implementation prior to the study. Data were collected through observations, memos, emails, and four focus group interviews with 10 participants including employees, managers, and occupational safety and health consultants.
resultsWorkplace 1 (WP1) implemented the toolbox, employing seven strategies: identifying and preparing champions, conducting a local needs assessment, distributing educational materials, reminding clinicians, tailoring strategies, organising implementation team meetings, and creating learning collaboratives. Key enablers included management engagement, ongoing exposure, and creating a safe environment, whereas lack of time was identified as a barrier. At workplace 2 (WP2), three strategies were employed: identifying and preparing champions, distributing educational materials, and conducting educational meetings. However, the toolbox was never fully implemented, hindered by time-related barriers, organisational restructuring, and unclear roles and responsibilities.
conclusionsEffective implementation of workplace MSD interventions requires management engagement, time allocation, and clear roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.