ReviewIrish journal of medical science2026
A case of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: case report and literature review.
Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a very rare and life-threateningmalignant tumor. CASE: We present a report of a rare case of a 70-year-old female patient with emaciation and poor appetite as manifestations. The characteristics of signs and clinical manifestations in this case were atypical. Abdominal CT scan revealed a large mass in the right retroperitoneal region beside the inferior vena cava. A neurogenic tumor was considered, and a ganglioneuroma was highly likely. There was no indication of multiple peritoneal implants/seedings in the peritoneum, omentum and liver. Subsequently, an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed. The samples were processed into cell blocks, followed by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical staining for observation. The results indicated a possible diagnosis of mesothelioma, while neurogenic tumors were ruled out. DISCUSSION: During the operation, Multiplenodular tumor lesions were observed between the hepatogastric ligament, on the surface of the liver, inthe omentum, and at the splenic hilum, indicating that enhanced CT has certain limitations. If PET-CThad been performed preoperatively, the diagnosis might have been more comprehensive. The diagnosisof DMPM was further verified by laparotomy biopsy. EUS-FNA is a good auxiliary diagnostic method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.