ArticleThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2026
Prevalence and CT angiographic evaluation of coronary artery anomalies in 20,243 consecutive patients: a retrospective study.
Article in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery anomalies (CAAs) are rare congenital abnormalities involving the origin, course, or structure of coronary arteries. While often incidental, some variants have clinical and procedural implications. With the increasing use of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), more anomalies are being detected, yet large-scale data from India remain limited.
objectivesTo evaluate the prevalence, anatomical patterns, and clinical relevance of CAAs over a 12-year period using CTCA at a high-volume tertiary cardiac center in India.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 20,243 consecutive patients undergoing multidetector CTCA between January 2011 and October 2023 were analyzed. Coronary anomalies were categorized into myocardial bridging (MB) and non-MB types based on Angelini's classification. Each scan was independently reviewed by both a radiologist and a cardiologist.
resultsCoronary artery anomalies (CAAs) were identified in 1513 patients (overall prevalence 7.5%), largely driven by myocardial bridging (MB). When MB was excluded, the prevalence of non-bridging anomalies was 0.9% (n = 183), including both isolated and combined cases. Isolated myocardial bridging was the most common finding, identified in 1330 patients (87.9%), predominantly involving the mid-segment of the left anterior descending artery. Isolated non-bridging anomalies were observed in 171 patients, while 12 patients had combined MB and non-MB anomalies. Among non-bridging anomalies, the most frequent included anomalous right coronary artery origin from the left sinus with an interarterial course (26.9%), retroaortic left circumflex artery (9.9%), separate origins of the LAD and LCX (8.8%), and high take-off anomalies (7.6%). Most anomalies were classified according to Angelini's framework, with a small subset remaining unclassified due to atypical anatomical presentations.
conclusionsThis 12-year retrospective cross-sectional study represents one of the largest single-center CTCA-based datasets on coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) globally. The findings highlight the utility of CTCA in detecting and characterizing both benign and potentially significant anomalies. The anatomical insights derived from this cohort have direct clinical relevance, aiding interventional cardiologists in procedural planning and risk stratification. Future multicenter studies are warranted to further refine diagnostic algorithms and management strategies across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.