ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
Robustness-by-design for Probiotic Foods: Mechanisms, Non-thermal Stress Conditioning, and Engineered Microenvironments.
Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incorporation of probiotic dairy and non-dairy foods is often limited by the loss of bioactivity caused by stresses to which microorganisms are subjected during processing, storage, and digestion. This frequently results in probiotic counts below the minimum level required to exert their probiotic function (10⁷ CFU/g) at the time of consumption. Maintaining cell viability remains a challenge for probiotic food manufacturers. The omics technologies have enabled the identification of stress response pathways in microorganisms; however, their application to the design of reproducible and scalable processes remains limited. This review integrates microbial stress physiology with bioprocesses and food matrix engineering to support the design of robust probiotic products. Biological mechanisms underlying increased tolerance to environmental stresses are analyzed and preadaptation strategies based on sublethal exposure to heat, acid and bile, ultrasound, pulsed electric fields, and high-pressure processing are discussed. Encapsulation systems are considered protective structures that reduce stress during food processing, storage, and digestion. To enhance the bioactivity of probiotics, a robustness-by-design approach is proposed. This begins with selecting the probiotic strain and the food. After selecting the probiotic strain, it is subjected to sublethal stress treatments to induce adaptive responses. The conditioned probiotic is incorporated into the food. The proposed scheme integrates survival kinetics and biomarkers to support process design. Biosafety aspects associated with sublethal stress are considered critical for the development of stable and safe probiotic foods on an industrial scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.