ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Effect of a Multi-specialty E-consultation Service on Hospital Referrals: An Interrupted Time-Series Study in the Netherlands.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundE-consultation services between family physicians and hospital specialists may help manage rising healthcare costs and improve care accessibility. Yet, robust evaluations of e-consultation impact on hospital referral patterns remain scarce.
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of a multi-specialty e-consultation service between family physicians and medical specialists on hospital referral rates.
designAn interrupted time series analysis was conducted in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2023, including family practices that submitted e-consultations to 11 specialties at a regional hospital.
participantsFamily practices from a specific region in the Netherlands that used the e-consultation service were included as the exposed group, and a national sample of family practices from the Nivel Primary Care Database served as the control group.
interventionImplementation of a multi-specialty e-consultation service. MAIN MEASURES: Monthly referral rates for outpatient clinic visits were analyzed utilizing seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) models and difference-in-differences analyses to evaluate trends before and after the introduction of the e-consultation service. Sensitivity analyses were performed using various lag periods, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on e-consultation volumes and family physician experience. KEY
resultsThere was a limited overall impact of e-consultations on hospital referral trends. Internal Medicine showed a regional reduction in referrals (-1.56% per month, p < 0.01), though this was not significant compared to national trends (difference-in-difference: 0.68%, p = 0.24). Surgery and Neurology showed significant regional increases (Surgery: + 1.76% per month, p < 0.01; Neurology: + 1.75% per month, p = 0.01), which were also significant compared to national trends in the difference-in-difference analysis (Surgery: -1.73%, p < 0.01; Neurology: -1.81%, p = 0.01). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not reveal consistent patterns or delayed effects.
conclusionsSpecialties did not show a clinically meaningful reduction in referrals, likely due to the relatively small proportion of e-consultations compared to regular referrals. While the overall effect was limited, targeted implementation of e-consultations within specific contexts may help optimize referral practices. Further research is needed to explore the contextual factors that influence the effectiveness of e-consultations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.