ArticleCurrent environmental health reports2026
Field Experiments on Health and the Built Environment in Urban Settings: A Scoping Review.
Article in Current environmental health reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewScience has long examined how the built environment impacts health and wellbeing, yet most research has relied on observational and longitudinal studies. Much less attention has been paid to field experiments as a method to understand how environmental conditions may impact health. Although formal field experiments are common in public health, environmental psychology and related fields, they remain rare in urban planning and design despite their potential to inform how urban transformations may improve health and wellbeing. This scoping review examines how field experiments have been used to assess the health and wellbeing impacts of the built environment. RECENT
findingsFollowing an extensive keyword search, we identified studies published between 2015 and 2025 that employed a field experimental design in an urban or peri-urban context and directly assessed health-related outcomes associated with built environment characteristics or interventions. A total of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed according to their topical focus, methodological design, assessed health outcomes, and reported challenges and limitations. Most studies focused on the health and wellbeing impacts of exposure to urban green features, accounting for over two thirds of reviewed studies. Mental health and wellbeing outcomes were assessed more frequently than physical health outcomes, often through a combination of self-reported and objective physiological measures. Only a limited number of studies involved direct interventions or transformations of the built environment, while most compared existing environmental conditions. The limited number of field experiments addressing issues beyond urban green features suggests there is considerable opportunity to expand the use of field experiments to assess the health impacts of other types of built environment interventions, particularly in the context of the growing popularity of tactical urbanism and temporary urban transformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.