ArticleAdvances in therapy2026
Evaluation of Documented Infections by Provider Specialty in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Receiving Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Claims Database Analysis.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeople with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have an increased risk of infections. There are limited data characterizing who initially diagnoses infections in pwMS and how these are communicated among healthcare providers.
methodsRetrospective US claims data from January 1, 2017 to August 31, 2024 were used to identify newly diagnosed pwMS aged 18-64 years who were taking any disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for ≥ 90 days. Index date was the earliest date of the first DMT claim. Infections were based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. Severe infections included events requiring hospitalization and/or intravenous antibiotics.
resultsOverall, 69,148 pwMS who were treatment-naïve met eligibility criteria. Mean age was 44.1 years; 72% were female; and 81% were < 1 year from initial MS diagnosis to DMT initiation. A total of 316,497 infection events were reported over the study period, with 98% first reported by non-neurology providers. There were 21,416 severe infection events reported, of which > 98% were first reported by non-neurologists. In pwMS with infection events first reported by non-neurologists, 6% had a neurology visit ≤ 7 days after initial infection; of those, 8% had any infection ICD-10-CM code recorded at that visit (increased to 19% for serious infections). In the 16% of pwMS with a neurology visit ≤ 30 days post initial infection reported by a non-neurologist, 6% had any infection ICD-10-CM code recorded at that neurology visit (increased to 14% for severe infections).
conclusionMost infections in pwMS are first reported by non-neurology providers, as most pwMS did not interact with their MS clinician in the first few months after infection, even if that infection was severe. These data highlight the importance of communication between different providers and patients to accurately assess patient status and DMT safety, leading to improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.