Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154369›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2026

Evaluation of Documented Infections by Provider Specialty in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Receiving Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Claims Database Analysis.

Peiqing Qian, Jenna Brunn, Wennifer Giglio, Kelly Holmes, Elijah Lackey, Jong-Mi Lee, Gabriel Pardo, James B Lewin, Danette Rutledge, Nicholas Belviso and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peiqing QianSwedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4774-7788
Jenna BrunnThe Oak Clinic, Uniontown, OH, USA.
Wennifer GiglioAtlanta Neuroscience Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kelly HolmesPiedmont HealthCare, Hickory, NC, USA.
Elijah LackeyAdvanced Neurology of Colorado, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3043-1277
Jong-Mi LeeStanford Multiple Sclerosis Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Gabriel PardoOklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2207-3708
James B LewinBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2352-9113
Danette RutledgeBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nicholas BelvisoBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Babak Amerian-WilliamsBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA. babak.amerianwilliams@biogen.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5117-9871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have an increased risk of infections. There are limited data characterizing who initially diagnoses infections in pwMS and how these are communicated among healthcare providers.

methodsRetrospective US claims data from January 1, 2017 to August 31, 2024 were used to identify newly diagnosed pwMS aged 18-64 years who were taking any disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for ≥ 90 days. Index date was the earliest date of the first DMT claim. Infections were based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. Severe infections included events requiring hospitalization and/or intravenous antibiotics.

resultsOverall, 69,148 pwMS who were treatment-naïve met eligibility criteria. Mean age was 44.1 years; 72% were female; and 81% were < 1 year from initial MS diagnosis to DMT initiation. A total of 316,497 infection events were reported over the study period, with 98% first reported by non-neurology providers. There were 21,416 severe infection events reported, of which > 98% were first reported by non-neurologists. In pwMS with infection events first reported by non-neurologists, 6% had a neurology visit ≤ 7 days after initial infection; of those, 8% had any infection ICD-10-CM code recorded at that visit (increased to 19% for serious infections). In the 16% of pwMS with a neurology visit ≤ 30 days post initial infection reported by a non-neurologist, 6% had any infection ICD-10-CM code recorded at that neurology visit (increased to 14% for severe infections).

conclusionMost infections in pwMS are first reported by non-neurology providers, as most pwMS did not interact with their MS clinician in the first few months after infection, even if that infection was severe. These data highlight the importance of communication between different providers and patients to accurately assess patient status and DMT safety, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

InfectionsMultiple SclerosisAdolescentAdultDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultDisease-modifying therapiesHospitalizationInfectionMS providersMultiple sclerosisNeurologists

Identifiers

PMID42154369
PMCPMC13415341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.