ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Computed tomography-based assessment of sacroiliac joint variations: associations with sacral types, sex, and side.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate sacroiliac joint (SIJ) variations and to examine their associations with sacral morphology types across sex and side using computed tomography.
methodsThis retrospective study included computed tomography images of 400 adults (200 females, 200 males). Sacral morphology was classified on sagittal images based on the presence and morphology of the S1-S2 intervertebral disc. SIJ variations were identified on corresponding axial images. The distribution of SIJ variations according to sex and side and their associations with sacral types were analyzed.
resultsSIJ variations were observed in 43% of individuals with type 1 sacrum, 41% of those with type 2 sacrum, and 25% of those with type 3 sacrum. Overall, variations were detected 60.5% of females and 25.5% of males, indicating a significantly higher prevalence in females. Most variations demonstrated bilateral involvement. The accessory SIJ was the most frequent variation, followed by the iliosacral complex and semicircular defect. Sacral morphology was predominantly type 1, followed by type 2, with a significant sex-related difference in distribution. Although SIJ variations were observed across different sacral types, no clear linear association with sacral morphology was identified.
conclusionSIJ variations are common, predominantly bilateral, and more frequently observed in females, supporting a mechanical rather than inflammatory origin. The high prevalence of accessory SIJ highlights its importance as a potential source of diagnostic confusion in SIJ imaging. Combined evaluation of sacral morphology and SIJ variations provides an integrated anatomical framework that improve radiological interpretation and reduce diagnostic uncertainty in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154298What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.