SynthesisRheumatology international2026
Targeting type I interferon in lupus panniculitis: a case-based systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lupus panniculitis (LEP) is a rare form of cutaneous lupus (CLE) characterised by progressive, often disfiguring course and poor response to treatment. Type I interferon inhibition through anifrolumab (ANF) is effective in CLE but limited data are available for its use in LEP. To address this issue, we screened patients with CLE and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) for biopsy-proven diagnoses of LEP and treatment with ANF. Besides demographics, general clinical features, concomitant treatments before and after ANF and safety signals, we measured disease activity and damage with the SLE disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K), the CLE Disease Area and Severity Index activity (CLASI-A) and damage scores and the SLE International collaborating clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index. The same data were retrieved, when available, from existing cases extracted from systematic literature review. Sixteen cases were identified, including 3/421 newly described patients, with two receiving ANF as first-line immunosuppressant and one as an early treatment devoid of oral corticosteroids. All patients had a good response to treatment and most of them could taper or discontinue corticosteroids. CLASI-A scores were markedly reduced after ANF treatment [11.5 (7-29)] to 0 (0-2); p = 0.005]. The time to response was within five months in most cases. No significant adverse events were reported. Taken together, our data suggest that ANF might be effective in LEP and used as a first-line treatment to prevent LEP-related damage accrual.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.