ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Type of pledget and suture technique relative to esophageal tensile strength in long-gap esophageal atresia.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to investigate whether pledget presence, pledget composition, and full versus partial thickness suture technique affect the force esophageal tissue can withstand before tearing.
methodsA right thoracotomy was performed on 10 deceased fetal sheep, 110-114 days gestation. The esophagus was divided at the level of the carina and 2 cm of tissue was removed to mimic long-gap esophageal atresia. The pouches were sutured with horizontal mattress non-absorbable braided polyester suture using one of three methods: polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) pledgets, bovine pericardial pledgets, or no pledget, in full or partial thickness manner. Each suture was attached to a tensiometer and manually tightened at 50 gram-force / 30 s. Maximal force before esophageal tearing and time to tearing were measured. Results were compared using a linear mixed model.
resultsPTFE pledgets withstood significantly more force than pericardial pledgets (p = 0.029) and provided longer duration before tearing compared to no pledget (p = 0.017) and pericardial pledgets (p = 0.047). Full versus partial-thickness technique made no difference.
conclusionIn a deceased fetal lamb long-gap esophageal atresia model, PTFE pledgets improved tissue resistance to tearing (PTFE > pericardial) and prolonged stretch duration (PTFE > pericardial or no pledget). Suture thickness (full vs. partial) made no difference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.