Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154256›Full record

SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Combined Abdominoplasty and Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review of Surgical and Patient-Centered Outcomes.

Gianluca Marcaccini, Elena Bagalà, Ho Shan Polly Huang, Raj Saini, Luca Grimaldi, Omar Shadid, Roberto Cuomo, Ishith Seth, Namal Munasinghe, Warren M Rozen

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gianluca MarcacciniPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy. g.marcaccini@student.unisi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8621-8216
Elena BagalàPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Ho Shan Polly HuangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, 2 Hastings Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Raj SainiFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Luca GrimaldiPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Omar ShadidDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, 2 Hastings Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Roberto CuomoPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Ishith SethDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, 2 Hastings Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Namal MunasingheDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Monash Health, VIC, 3175, Australia.
Warren M RozenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, 2 Hastings Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether ventral or incisional hernias should be repaired during abdominoplasty remains disputed.

methodsA PROSPERO-registered PRISMA-2020 systematic review searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane on June 15, 2025. Twenty-four studies (2 randomised trials, 2 propensity-matched registry analyses, 19 cohort series and 1 case report) encompassed 3142 adults, 1456 of whom underwent a single-stage repair, were included. Primary outcomes analysed were surgical-site occurrence (SSO), hernia recurrence, reoperation and patient-reported measures.

resultsMedian SSO after combined repair was 20% (range 0-51 %), an absolute increase of 7-8 % versus abdominoplasty alone; most events were minor seromas or superficial infections. The 30-day readmission rate was ≤ 3%, and the unplanned reoperation rate was approximately 6%, similar to the rate for abdominoplasty alone. Durability was excellent: 21 recurrences (1.4%) occurred at a median 23-month follow-up, and neither randomised trial showed excess failure. Propensity-matched analyses likewise revealed no uptick in severe morbidity. Validated instruments demonstrated substantial gains in physical function (SF-36 + 25), body-image distress (DAS-24-16 to - 33) and overall satisfaction (> 90%).

conclusionsContemporary evidence suggests that simultaneous abdominoplasty and ventral/incisional hernia repair delivers durable closure and substantial functional and cosmetic benefits, while adding only a modest, largely minor increase in wound morbidity. For patients with a BMI < 35 kg/m LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

AbdominoplastyHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyAdultFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRecurrenceReoperationRisk AssessmentSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeAbdominoplastyCombined procedurePatient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeSurgical-site complicationsVentral hernia repair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.