ArticleSurgery today2026
The short-term outcomes of minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic artery resection and splenic vein preservation: A comparative study with the Warshaw technique.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSpleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) is performed for benign or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic body and tail. The Warshaw technique (WT), involving the division of the splenic artery and vein, is associated with splenic infarction and gastric varices. Recently, SPDP with splenic artery resection and splenic vein preservation (SVP) has been introduced. However, its safety and feasibility remain unclear. This study compared the perioperative outcomes between the SVP and WT approaches.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data on patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted SPDP between January 2019 and December 2024. Of these, seven patients underwent SVP and 24 underwent WT. The clinical outcomes, complications, and postoperative imaging findings were evaluated.
resultsThe baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The operative time, blood loss, postoperative inflammatory markers, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula showed no significant differences. Contrast-enhanced CT on postoperative day 7 demonstrated splenic infarction in 2 of 4 SVP patients (50%) and 14 of 22 WT patients (63.6%, p = 0.625). Gastric varices were observed only in the WT group (22.7%, p = 0.555). Splenic vein thrombosis did not occur in the SVP group.
conclusionsThe SVP approach is thus considered to be safe and feasible, with perioperative outcomes comparable to WT. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154251What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.