ArticleSurgery today2026
Short-term outcomes of self-expanding metallic stents and transanal colorectal tubes as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colon cancer: a nationwide retrospective study.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeObstructive colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis. Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMSs) and transanal colorectal tubes (TCTs) are used as a bridge to surgery (BTS). However, comparative evidence is limited. This study compared the short-term outcomes of SEMS and TCT placement using a nationwide database.
methodsWe identified 19,564 patients who underwent colectomy after SEMS or TCT placement for cT3-4N0-2M0 colon cancer between 2012 and 2022 using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. After exclusion, 16,033 patients were analyzed. Propensity score matching generated 5,203 matched pairs for analysis. Outcomes were compared using conditional logistic regression and linear fixed-effect models.
resultsThe overall stoma rate was significantly lower in the SEMS group than in the TCT group (odds ratio [OR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.35). SEMS placement was associated with reduced postoperative abdominal drainage (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.28-0.35) and reoperation (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20-0.31) rates. The total hospital stay was shorter in the SEMS group (regression coefficient, - 3.5 days; 95%CI, - 4.3 to - 2.6).
conclusionsThis nationwide cohort study showed that SEMS placement significantly reduced perioperative stoma construction compared with TCT placement. A lower frequency of stoma construction, postoperative abdominal drainage, and reoperation was associated with shorter total hospital stays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154247What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.