Observational studyDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2026
Multifocal visual evoked potential in thyroid associated ophthalmopathy.
Observational study in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the visual function in patients with thyroid associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) without clinical optic neuropathy by multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) and to correlate the findings with Humphrey visual field (HVF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT).
methodsThis observational case-control study recruited a consecutive group of euthyroid TAO patients (excluding those with optic neuropathy) and a healthy matched control group. Ophthalmological assessment was done followed by HVF test, OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC), and mfVEP. For mfVEP, results were reported as mean signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of upper and lower sectors of rings 5-6 (9.9°-22°).
resultsThirty patients were included in each group (TAO patients and controls). No significant differences were observed between the groups in RNFL thickness, GCC thickness, or upper/lower hemifield VF parameters. Analysis of the mfVEP revealed that, before multiple comparisons correction, SNR was lower in TAO patients. A repeated measures analysis of variance confirmed significant main effects for both patient group (p = 0.004), and test location (comparing SNR in the upper vs. lower sectors of rings 5-6) (p < 0.001), but no significant interaction.
conclusionIn this limited cohort, initial analysis of mfVEP results suggested reduction of the SNR in TAO patients without clinical optic neuropathy, but these findings did not remain statistically robust after adjustment for multiple comparisons. mfVEP alterations occurred despite normal OCT and visual field findings and warrant further evaluation in larger, longitudinal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.