ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Peranal Endoscopic Myectomy for Lower Rectal Lesions with Severe Fibrosis: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimPeranal endoscopic myectomy (PAEM), also known as endoscopic intermuscular dissection, enables resection of lower rectal lesions with severe submucosal fibrosis by dissecting the inner circular muscle. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PAEM.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent PAEM for lower rectal lesions between January 2017 and December 2024 at the Osaka International Cancer Institute. PAEM was performed intentionally after October 2023, whereas unintentional PAEM occurred during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) prior to October 2023. Short-term outcomes were assessed, and negative vertical margin rates were compared between groups.
resultsAmong 242 consecutive patients who underwent ESD for lower rectal lesions, PAEM was performed in 25 patients (unintentional PAEM, 13; intentional PAEM, 12). The median age was 66 years (range, 38-89 years), and 14 patients (56%) were female. En bloc resection was performed for all 25 lesions. Histological examinations showed 19 adenocarcinomas (pTis, 3; pT1, 11; pT2, 5), 3 other tumors, and 3 non-residual tumors (salvage treatment after endoscopic resection). After PAEM, hematochezia occurred in 14 patients (56%), but most cases were self-limited and one patient had hematochezia requiring prolonged hospitalization. The negative vertical margin rate was higher in the intentional PAEM group than in the unintentional PAEM group, with similar findings observed in an additional analysis excluding salvage cases (88% vs. 33%, P = 0.007).
conclusionsPAEM was feasible and generally safe. Intentional PAEM may facilitate vertical margin control in selected cases with severe fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.