Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154119›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2026

When Random Variation Results in Functional Segregation.

Jacob Barfield, Patrick Kells, Shree Gautam, Woodrow Shew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacob BarfieldPhysics Department, Hollins University, 7916 Williamson Rd, Roanoke, VA, 24020, USA. barfieldjh@hollins.edu.
Patrick KellsPhysics Department, University of Arkansas, 1 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.
Shree GautamPhysics Department, University of Arkansas, 1 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.
Woodrow ShewPhysics Department, University of Arkansas, 1 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many functional properties vary dramatically across neurons in cerebral cortex. Two fundamental goals of systems neuroscience are to determine which neurons execute which functions and how the different functional properties of a neuron are related. Here we focus on functional segregation - when two separate subpopulation of neurons encodes two distinct functions. Often, it is assumed that if two functional properties are uncorrelated across the population, then there is no functional segregation. Here we show that this assumption can lead to wrong conclusions; functional segregation can emerge, by chance, due to random variation when that variation is distributed according to skewed, heavy-tailed distributions. We reexamine the results we previously reported (Nature communications, 10(1), 1575-1575 2019), which showed that neurons in primary motor cortex tend to be functionally segregated, with neurons that are either strongly coupled to body movements or to ongoing cortical population activity. Here we show that this is a prime example of functional segregation due to random variation.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalMotor CortexNeuronsAnimalsFunctional segregationHeavy-tailed distributionsMotor cortex

Identifiers

PMID42154119
PMCPMC13186786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.