ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2026
Passive cooling garments for outdoor thermal adaptation: a field experiment.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thermal adaptation and mitigation measures have been actively undertaken owing to warming climates, focusing on human-centered designs. Because clothing affects human energy balance namely thermal comfort, a suitable choice of clothing can be thermal adaptation. Similar to typical urban mitigations, two passive cooling techniques, which are ventilation and solar reflection were applied to a conventional garment. Accordingly, four types of garments (non-reflective loose-fitting, non-reflective tight-fitting, solar-reflective loose-fitting, and solar-reflective tight-fitting) were prepared and investigated by participants in terms of physical thermal load and subjective perceptions. Field measurements during walking were conducted in summer outdoors. Overall human thermal loads for clothed participants were smaller than undressed condition, indicating wearing clothing fundamentally acts as a buffer against environments suggesting comfort. Because the main heat-gain mechanism outdoors is irradiation, significant difference was observed in radiative heat gain between reflective loose and non-reflective loose, as well as reflective tight and non-reflective tight wearers. Despite the main cooling mechanism is convective heat loss, no significant difference in convective heat loss between loose and tight fitting garments were observed. Observed relationships among thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and human thermal load further suggest the validity of the experiments. Ideally, garments with both reflective and ventilation can improve thermal exposure significantly compared with the conventional garment. Our small scheme for heat adaptation in summer outdoor was confirmed in human energy balance; however, it did not work satisfactorily in perceptions, and thus more effective measures accompanying with detailed understanding of clothing effects are expected even under varying climate conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.