Trial reportAnnals of hematology2026
Acalabrutinib vs chlorambucil plus rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A randomized phase 3 Asian study.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075292 (A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Acalabrutinib Versus Chlorambucil Plus Rituximab in Subjects With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Acalabrutinib Versus Chlorambucil Plus Rituximab in Subjects With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acalabrutinib is a selective, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in multiple countries for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Acalabrutinib is approved in China for patients with CLL who received ≥ 1 prior therapy. We report results from a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study (NCT04075292) evaluating the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib vs chlorambucil plus rituximab (C + R) in medically unfit patients with treatment-naive CLL in Asia. As of January 3, 2024, 155 patients (overall cohort: acalabrutinib, n = 77; C + R, n = 78; China cohort [mainland China and Taiwan], n = 53 and n = 50, respectively) were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 23.5 and 18.2 months in the overall and China cohorts, respectively, acalabrutinib demonstrated a 92% risk reduction of disease progression or death vs C + R (both cohorts: hazard ratio, 0.08; P < 0.0001; primary endpoint). Overall response rates were 76.6% vs 71.8% with median duration of response not reached vs 11.6 months in the acalabrutinib vs C + R arms, respectively. In the acalabrutinib arm, no atrial fibrillation or hypertension events were observed. Efficacy and safety were consistent across cohorts. Acalabrutinib was well tolerated and demonstrated a progression-free survival benefit vs C + R in this Asian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.