ArticlePsychological research2026
The consistency of task-relevant and task-irrelevant vocal cues modulates speech judgments during dichotic listening.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During speech perception, listeners simultaneously process various vocal cues (such as identity information like the speaker's sex or age, or expression cues like confidence), yet it remains unclear which type of information receives prioritized processing. This study systematically examines how attentional task goals modulate the interaction between task-relevant and task-irrelevant cues, and how this interplay shapes the hierarchical processing of speech-related dimensions such as identity (e.g., sex or age) and expression (e.g., confidence). The current study utilized a dichotic listening paradigm across two experiments to investigate how identity and expression information in vocal cues are processed, focusing on the role of attentional relevance. Participants listened to two vocal stimuli simultaneously in each ear and were instructed to focus on either identity (manipulated by speaker sex in Experiment 1 and age in Experiment 2) or expression (varying levels of confidence). In this study, task-relevant information consistency across ears refers to the consistency of target judgment information (e.g., sex in the sex judgment task) between the left and right ears in dichotic listening, while task-irrelevant information consistency across ears refers to the consistency of non-target judgment information (e.g., confidence in the sex judgment task) between the two ears. When attending to identity, consistent identity cues between ears led to faster responses and higher accuracy. However, when attending to expression, response times showed no significant difference across expression consistency, but accuracy improved when identity cues were consistent-even though identity was task-irrelevant. These findings suggest a functional prioritization of vocal identity over expression during speech processing, highlighting the hierarchical and goal-dependent nature of vocal cue extraction. The asymmetrical effects of processing task-relevant and task-irrelevant information, depending on vocal cues, emerge when identity processing is less demanding than expression evaluation, suggesting the functional priority of vocal identity over vocal expression in multiple displays during speech perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154045What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.