Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154042›Full record

ArticleJBI evidence synthesis2026

Effectiveness of organizational interventions vs usual care for reducing incidence and mitigating impact of workplace violence on registered nurses: a systematic review protocol.

Domenico Cannizzaro, Ilaria Saguatti, Dalia Caleffi, Sergio Rovesti, Paola Ferri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBI evidence synthesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Domenico CannizzaroClinical and Experimental Medicine Ph.D. Program, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-6675-2788
Ilaria SaguattiClinical and Experimental Medicine Ph.D. Program, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-4285-7352
Dalia CaleffiClinical and Experimental Medicine Ph.D. Program, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-8696-5447
Sergio RovestiDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1499-3897
Paola FerriDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7761-7226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this review will be to evaluate the effectiveness of multilevel interventions, including communication strategies and other organizational measures targeting structures, processes, policies, and culture, compared to usual care or no intervention, in reducing the incidence and severity of verbal and physical workplace violence against registered nurses.

introductionWorkplace violence against nurses includes verbal, physical, and psychological abuse, with lasting consequences on their mental health, job satisfaction, and workforce retention. Although awareness of the phenomenon has increased, the existing evidence on prevention and management interventions remains fragmented and inconclusive. This review will synthesize the current evidence to identify effective strategies, thereby supporting institutional decision-making and protecting frontline nurses. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This review will consider experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies that evaluate interventions aimed at preventing, managing, or mitigating workplace violence against registered nurses.

methodsThe proposed review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The main databases to be searched will include MEDLINE Ultimate (EBSCOhost), Embase (Embase.com), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane CENTRAL, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and Google Scholar (first 200 records). Additional records will be identified through forward and backward citation tracking. Two reviewers will independently review the studies, assess methodological quality, and extract data. Data synthesis will be performed and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. No date restrictions will be applied (from database inception to January 9, 2026). Studies published in English will be included, while studies in other languages will be considered with translation support at the title and abstract level. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251125105.

Indexed as

NursesWorkplace ViolenceHumansIncidenceResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicWorking ConditionsWorkplaceintervention strategiesorganizational interventionsregistered nursesworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID42154042
PMCPMC13649260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.