ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Decision-Making in Refractory Overactive Bladder: Evaluation of a Novel Patient Decision Aid and its Impact on Decisional Conflict.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRefractory overactive bladder (OAB) lacks formal definition and is poorly understood. Its management requires patients to choose an invasive treatment, including intravesical botulinum toxin A (BOTOX®), sacral neuromodulation (SNM) and posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), which have varying rates of efficacy and side effects. These decisions can be complex for patients to make, especially within the time constraints of outpatient clinic appointments. A new patient decision aid (PDA) has been developed to support patients during this shared decision-making process.
aimThis study assesses decisional conflict scores and patient satisfaction in those who use a novel PDA for refractory OAB.
methodsConsecutive new patients with refractory OAB were provided with the PDA prior to decision-making. Patients then had a virtual follow-up appointment to assess their decisional conflict, using a validated scale. The total decisional conflict score was calculated. Treatment choice and free-text feedback were also analysed.
resultsTwenty-five patients were included. Following use of the PDA, a range of treatment choices were made, including SNM (n = 6), PTNS (n = 10), BOTOX® (n = 6) and continuation with medical therapy (n = 3). Overall, decisional conflict was low, with 100% of patients having a score of less than 25. Subscores suggested improved patient understanding, with the PDA increasing clarification.
conclusionIntroduction of this novel PDA, in those requiring treatment for refractory OAB, was associated with low decisional conflict and positive patient feedback. This supports its use in shared decision-making, empowering patients to make an informed and individualised choice regarding their treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.