ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Management of recurrent urolithiasis: indications for therapy escalation and discontinuation].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urolithiasis is a common condition characterized by a high recurrence rate and substantial clinical and economic impact. Stone formers are stratified into low- and high-risk groups based on stone analysis and basic diagnostic evaluation. Following a stone event (spontaneous passage or interventional treatment), all patients should receive general preventive measures, including increased fluid intake, dietary modification, and lifestyle changes. High-risk patients should additionally undergo extended metabolic evaluation (24 h urine analysis) and, if indicated, targeted pharmacological therapy. Therapeutic escalation is warranted in cases of recurrent stone formation, persistent metabolic abnormalities in 24 h urine, or high-risk stone types (e.g., brushite, cystine). The primary aim is correction of pathological urinary parameters by reducing lithogenic factors (calcium, oxalate, uric acid) and increasing inhibitors of stone formation (citrate, magnesium). Pharmacological treatment mainly includes alkaline citrates, thiazides, and xanthine oxidase inhibitors, initiated at low doses and adjusted according to urinary and, if necessary, serum parameters. Therapy de-escalation or discontinuation may be considered in patients with sustained stone-free status and stable metabolic findings, considering age, recurrence dynamics, and comorbidities (particularly hypertension, diabetes, and obesity). Individualized management in interdisciplinary collaboration with nephrology, primary care, and nutritional medicine is essential, as urolithiasis should be regarded as a complex metabolic disorder. Patient adherence remains a key determinant of long-term therapeutic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.