ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Synthesis, computational studies, and biological evaluation of novel cyanoacrylamides as potential anticancer agents.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel series of cyanoacrylamides based on thiazole was synthesized and characterized by different physicochemical and multispectral investigations. The new compounds have been assessed for their cytotoxic potential against several human cancer cell lines (HCT-116, MCF-7, HEp-2, and WI-38). Compound 5g, incorporating 4-(piperidin-1-yl)phenyl moiety, was selected as it emerged to achieve the potent cytotoxic effect against HCT-116 and MCF-7 cell lines, with IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
42154011What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.