ArticleClinical and translational science2026
CYP2C19 Polymorphism and Platelet Aggregation-Associated Risks in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing PCI.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms impact the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel and associate with ischemic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to evaluate the association of CYP2C19 and platelet reactivity (PR) with these risks, in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing PCI, treated with an oral anticoagulation (OAC) and clopidogrel. This two-center prospective cohort study included patients with AF and OAC undergoing PCI. Carriers of ≥ 1 loss-of-function (LOF) allele were classified as poor/intermediate metabolizers (PM/IM), whereas carriers of ≥ 1 gain-of-function allele without LOF alleles were classified as rapid metabolizers (RM). PR was assessed by thromboelastography (TEG) and/or multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA). The primary outcome included death, MI, or stroke at 6 months ±2 weeks; the secondary outcome consisted of non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) or major bleeding. Among 283 patients (median age 78 years; 72% male), 73 (26%) were PM/IM, 108 (38%) were NM, and 102 (36%) were RM. PM/IM status was not significantly associated with the primary ischemic outcome (PM/IM: 6 [8.2%] vs. NM + RM: 16 [7.6%], p = 0.869), but any bleeding rates were numerically lower. While there was a trend for association of high platelet reactivity (HPR) with the ischemic outcome (OR 2.005 [95% CI 0.820-4.902], p = 0.127), low platelet reactivity (LPR) was associated with major bleeding (OR 2.646 [95% CI 1.075-6.509], p = 0.034). PM/IM status did not detect an increased ischemic risk but might, however, protect from bleeding risk in AF patients undergoing PCI. HPR might indicate a higher ischemic risk, while LPR was associated with major bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.