Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42153783›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Enhanced Efficacy of Cefiderocol With PolyTrim Combination Therapy in a Rabbit Model of Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Keratitis.

Eric G Romanowski, Emily K Young, Jonathan B Mandell, Deepinder K Dhaliwal, Alex Mammen, Vishal Jhanji, Michael E Zegans, Robert M Q Shanks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eric G RomanowskiThe Charles T. Campbell Ophthalmic Microbiology Laboratory, UPMC Vision Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Emily K YoungThe Charles T. Campbell Ophthalmic Microbiology Laboratory, UPMC Vision Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Jonathan B MandellThe Charles T. Campbell Ophthalmic Microbiology Laboratory, UPMC Vision Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Deepinder K DhaliwalThe Charles T. Campbell Ophthalmic Microbiology Laboratory, UPMC Vision Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Alex MammenThe Charles T. Campbell Ophthalmic Microbiology Laboratory, UPMC Vision Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Vishal JhanjiThe Charles T. Campbell Ophthalmic Microbiology Laboratory, UPMC Vision Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Michael E ZegansGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Robert M Q ShanksThe Charles T. Campbell Ophthalmic Microbiology Laboratory, UPMC Vision Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

Virus Production and Manipulation of Protein/Gene Expression ModuleP30EY008098 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Yuanyuan Chen · 1989 to 2026
$17.8M
Extensively drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis outbreak strain:  virulence mechanisms and mitigationR01EY036686 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROBERT M SHANKS · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008098NEI NIH HHS R01 EY036686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The 2023 Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis outbreak linked to contaminated artificial tears underscored the need for new therapies against extensively drug-resistant ocular pathogens. In vitro data suggested additive or synergistic activity between the siderophore-cephalosporin cefiderocol (FDC) and either moxifloxacin (MOX) or polymyxin B sulfate (PB). Here, we tested whether combining FDC with the commercial formulations of MOX (0.5%) or PolyTrim (PT; PB 10,000 U/mL + trimethoprim 0.1%) improved in vivo outcomes. Methods: New Zealand White rabbits were injected intrastromally with 5000 CFU of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain CDC1270. After 16 hours, established infections were treated every 30 minutes for 8 hours with FDC, followed 5 minutes later by MOX or PT. Additional groups received monotherapies or saline. Bacterial burden (CFU/cornea) and anterior chamber cultures were determined, and ocular inflammation was assessed. Results: FDC + MOX reduced bacterial burden by 2.8 log10 CFU, outperforming FDC and MOX monotherapies, although no eyes were sterilized. PT monotherapy produced a significant 3.2 log10 reduction in CFU. The FDC + PT combination yielded the most potent activity, with almost 6.9 log10 reduction and sterilization of 10 of 12 corneas. Notably, anterior chamber invasion occurred in saline and MOX groups but in none of the FDC-containing groups, and perforations were absent in all FDC and PT treatments. Conclusions: FDC + PT was superior to monotherapies and to FDC + MOX, achieving frequent sterilization and preventing intraocular spread and corneal perforations. These data support PT alone or in combination with FDC as promising therapeutic candidates for the treatment of XDR P. aeruginosa keratitis.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsCorneal UlcerDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEye Infections, BacterialKeratitisPolymyxin BPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsTrimethoprimAnimalsCefiderocolDisease Models, AnimalDrug Therapy, CombinationMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoxifloxacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefiderocolCephalosporinsMoxifloxacinPolymyxin BTrimethoprim

Identifiers

PMID42153783
PMCPMC13206753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.