Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42153768›Full record

Observational studyAnatomical sciences education2026

Analysis of anxiety levels and perceived satisfaction after a first encounter with human body prosection among nursing undergraduates based on their self-perceived presession nervousness: An observational study.

Mónica Grande-Alonso, María Teresa García-de Juan, Irene Méndez-Mesón, Soledad Aguado-Henche, Rafael Ramírez-Carracedo, Roberto Fernández-Baillo, Mauricio Hernández-Fernández, Alba Sebastián-Martín, Rafael Moreno-Gómez-Toledano

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mónica Grande-AlonsoUniversity of Alcalá, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1056-7305
María Teresa García-de JuanUniversity of Alcalá, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain.
Irene Méndez-MesónUniversity of Alcalá, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5296-2987
Soledad Aguado-HencheUniversity of Alcalá, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-3618
Rafael Ramírez-CarracedoUniversity of Alcalá, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8391-2245
Roberto Fernández-BailloUniversity of Alcalá, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1185-1444
Mauricio Hernández-FernándezUniversity of Alcalá, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1130-2779
Alba Sebastián-MartínUniversity of Alcalá, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-8964
Rafael Moreno-Gómez-ToledanoUniversity of Alcalá, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-289X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human body prosection practices are a crucial educational tool for learning anatomy. However, the first exposure to donors' material can cause anxiety, which may affect students' learning experiences and emotional adjustment. This observational study aimed to analyze anxiety levels (state and trait) before and after a prosection session in first-year nursing undergraduates, as well as perceived satisfaction, considering their previously perceived subjective level of nervousness. A total of 231 students participated voluntarily. Participants were grouped according to their self-perceived nervousness (low vs. high). Anxiety was assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and after the activity, along with postactivity satisfaction questionnaires. The results showed a significant decrease in both state and trait anxiety after the session (p < 0.0001), particularly among students who reported higher initial nervousness. Satisfaction with the activity was high in both groups, with no significant differences. Interestingly, higher presession nervousness was not associated with lower satisfaction. Correlation analyses revealed that higher anxiety was moderately associated with lower satisfaction only in the low-nervousness group. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the most stressful aspect of prosection is the uncertainty about what students will encounter. After the session itself, anxiety levels decrease significantly. Therefore, future studies should explore interventions that help students become familiar with the dissection process before the practical session.

Indexed as

AnatomyAnxietyEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureatePersonal SatisfactionSelf ConceptStudents, NursingAdultFemaleHumansLearningMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultanatomyanxietylearning experiencenervousnessnursing degreeprosectionsatisfactionteaching

Identifiers

PMID42153768
PMCPMC13440739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.