Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42153762›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Statistical knockoffs improve biomarker discovery from transcriptomic data.

Julie Cartier, Johanna Lagoas, Youmna Ayadi, Adeline Fermanian, Chloé-Agathe Azencott, Florian Massip

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie CartierCentre for Computational Biology, Mines Paris, PSL University, 60 bd Saint-Michel, 75272 Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0006-7745-0634
Johanna LagoasCentre for Computational Biology, Mines Paris, PSL University, 60 bd Saint-Michel, 75272 Paris, France.
Youmna AyadiCentre for Computational Biology, Mines Paris, PSL University, 60 bd Saint-Michel, 75272 Paris, France.
Adeline FermanianLOPF, LOPF Califrais'Machine Learning Lab, 4 Quai du Val de Loire, 94550 Chevilly Larue, France.
Chloé-Agathe AzencottCentre for Computational Biology, Mines Paris, PSL University, 60 bd Saint-Michel, 75272 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1003-301X
Florian MassipCentre for Computational Biology, Mines Paris, PSL University, 60 bd Saint-Michel, 75272 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-0935

Funding

French Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-P3IA-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in sequencing technologies have enabled the generation of large amounts of data, offering new possibilities to identify relationships between biological units (e.g. genes) and phenotypic traits (e.g. disease outcomes). Yet, identifying these associations using variable selection methods remains challenging due to the high dimension ($p \gg n$) and the correlation structure of the data. To address these challenges, we study the applicability of the knockoff (KO) procedure. Introduced by Barber and Candès in 2015, the KO variable selection procedure has shown promising results on real biological data, such as Genome-Wide Association Studies. This method seeks to identify the truly important predictors by overcoming the correlation structure between variables while controlling the false discovery rate. Here, we study the applicability of the KO procedure on transcriptomic data in a classification setting. We conduct an extensive simulation study using real transcriptomic data to evaluate the performance of the KO framework in the context of high-dimensional classification. We find that the KO framework outperforms widely used variable selection models, and that using KO aggregation to mitigate the effect of KO stochasticity improves stability while maintaining the same power. Finally, applied to three real transcriptomic datasets, the KO framework made very few discoveries, highlighting its conservative nature and suggesting that other methods may substantially overestimate the number of relevant features.

Indexed as

BiomarkersGene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansBiomarkersknockoffstranscriptomicvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID42153762
PMCPMC13184975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.