ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026
Medical Versus Surgical Management of Acute Appendicitis in a Regional Hospital in South Africa: A Six-Year Review.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are We Truly Excluding Appendicoliths and Free Fluid Without Imaging? A Methodological Query on the Management of Acute Appendicitis in South Africa.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppendectomy is the current standard of care for acute appendicitis. However, accumulating international evidence suggests that medical antibiotic therapy is not inferior to appendectomy. Local factors may work for and against a medical approach. While prospective randomized trials are still to be performed in a South African setting, this study aimed to describe existing data within a geographically defined area. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective audit from 01/01/2018-31/12/2023 was performed at George Regional Hospital, South Africa. All adults and children over 12 years with a clinical or radiological diagnosis of acute appendicitis, without complicated disease mandating direct surgical appendectomy, were identified and separated into two groups, namely, those with initial medical management and those who underwent direct appendectomy. The primary aims were to compare the presentations and outcomes of acute appendicitis managed by antibiotic therapy or appendectomy. Secondary aims included describing the proportion of cases eligible for medical management, as well as post-treatment complications, including the recurrence rate. Analysis was descriptive and comparative with patients grouped as Direct Surgery (DS), Antibiotics Successful (AS) and Antibiotics Unsuccessful (AU).
resultsDirect surgical appendectomy was performed on 44% of the 650 cases. Of 365 (56%) cases that received antibiotic therapy, 190 (52%) were discharged without symptoms (AS), while 175 (48%) failed antibiotic therapy and underwent surgical appendectomy (AU) during first admission. Of the 190 patients who were discharged after antibiotic therapy only, 16 had recurrent symptoms, of which 14 underwent surgery and 2 had repeat antibiotic therapy. When comparing the AS to AU group, AS cases had a lower median heart rate (89 vs. 95 bpm; p < 0.05), lower C-reactive protein level (51 vs. 108 mg/L; p < 0.01) and lower Alvarado score (6 vs. 7; p < 0.01). Patients in the AS group had a median hospitalization of one day less than the DS group (p < 0.001), and two days less than the AU group (p < 0.001). When compared with DS, patients in the AU group experienced significantly fewer (p < 0.001) Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5 events.
conclusionHalf of patients with acute appendicitis treated medically, safely avoided appendectomy. In this context, antibiotic therapy may be considered in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.