Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42153419›Full record

Observational studyActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2026

Post-laryngectomy videofluoroscopic assessment in relation to olfactory rehabilitation through the physiological olfactory recovery technique.

Giuseppina Mirra, Giuseppe Tortoriello, Sabrina Spinosa, Mariangela Abagnale, Vincenzo Della Peruta, Jacopo Galli, Giulio Cesare Passali, Luigi D'Avino

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giuseppina MirraDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe TortorielloOtolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Unit, V. Monaldi" Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Sabrina SpinosaOtolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Unit, V. Monaldi" Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Mariangela AbagnaleOtolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Unit, V. Monaldi" Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo Della PerutaOtolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Unit, V. Monaldi" Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Naples, Italy.
Jacopo GalliUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Head and Neck, Policlinico Universitario, Fondazione A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Giulio Cesare PassaliUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Head and Neck, Policlinico Universitario, Fondazione A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Luigi D'AvinoOtolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Unit, V. Monaldi" Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To correlate the anatomo-physiological characteristics of post-laryngectomy changes, assessed by videofluoroscopy, with the outcome and modalities of olfactory rehabilitation using the physiological olfactory recovery technique (PORT). Materials and methods: From 2019 to 2021, a prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery of Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy, on 31 patients who had undergone total laryngectomy with primary placement of a tracheo-oesophageal voice prosthesis. All patients completed a proprioceptive training programme with a speech-language pathologist and learned the PORT method. At the end of the 10-session rehabilitation protocol, all participants demonstrated significant improvement in olfactory perception, which was maintained at long-term follow-up. During subsequent application of PORT in selected patients, notable inter-patient differences emerged in both the modality and timing of response to rehabilitation. This prompted an anatomo-physiological investigation of the post-laryngectomy changes to objectify these variable outcomes. As part of an ongoing collaborative project between the Otolaryngology and Radiology Units aimed at monitoring swallowing and phonatory function in laryngectomized patients, videofluoroscopic examinations were analysed. A total of 31 videofluoroscopic studies performed between February and October 2022 were reviewed. Results: Differences in patient responses to PORT correlated with individual anatomo-physiological variations in the amount and distribution of air reaching the proximal oesophagus during phonation - defined as the phonatory air bubble (PAB) - as well as with differences in the elasticity of the anatomical district examined. Five distinct types of proximal oesophageal PABs were identified, classified according to post-surgical anatomical characteristics and functional alterations related to adjuvant therapy, particularly radiation-induced fibrosis. Conclusions: PORT is an effective olfactory rehabilitation technique for laryngectomised patients with a trachea-oesophageal voice prosthesis, including those with complex anatomo-physiological conditions. Accurate interpretation of post-laryngectomy changes is essential for evaluating treatment efficacy: 28 of the 31 patients evaluated physiologically recovered the daily olfactory sniffing manoeuvre, although with variable modalities and timing. Overall, PORT represents a widely applicable and effective method for olfactory rehabilitation in the vast majority of patients with a tracheo-oesophageal voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy.

Indexed as

LaryngectomyOlfaction DisordersAgedFemaleFluoroscopyHumansLarynx, ArtificialMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionVideo Recordinglaryngectomyolfactionolfactory rehabilitationphonatory air bubbletracheoesophageal voice prosthesisvideofluoroscopy

Identifiers

PMID42153419
PMCPMC13189051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.