Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42153413›Full record

SynthesisActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2026

A systematic review of surgical outcomes and postoperative complications based on free flap selection for reconstructing primary or recurrent locally advanced laryngeal-hypopharyngeal tumours.

Pietro De Luca, Arianna Di Stadio, Monir Abousiam, Luca de Campora, Matteo Simone, Sofia Pangallo, Marco Radici, Luca Calabrese, Marco Benazzo, Angelo Camaioni and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pietro De LucaLaboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Arianna Di StadioLife and Health Science Department, Link University, Rome, Italy.
Monir AbousiamDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy.
Luca de CamporaOtolaryngology Department, Santa Rosa Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.
Matteo SimoneOtolaryngology Department, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Sofia PangalloDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy.
Marco RadiciOtolaryngology Department, Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Luca CalabreseDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy.
Marco BenazzoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Angelo CamaioniHead and Neck Department, Nostra Signora della Mercede Clinic, Rome, Italy.
Luca GazziniDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate surgical outcomes and postoperative complications according to free flap selection in patients undergoing reconstruction after total or extended pharyngolaryngectomy for locally advanced (cT3-T4a) laryngeal-hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and OVID databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2025. Adult patients undergoing partial or circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction with free flap reconstruction were included. Outcomes of interest were flap failure, pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF), stricture and functional results. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated when feasible. Results: Twenty-three retrospective studies including 1,849 patients were analysed. The jejunal free flap (JFF) was the most commonly used reconstruction (78%), followed by the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap (5%). Overall flap survival was high, with total flap necrosis occurring in 2.7% of cases. JFF reconstruction was associated with lower rates of stricture (3.8%) and PCF (3.3%) compared with ALT (9.2% and 5.5%, respectively). ALT reconstruction showed a significantly increased risk of stricture compared to JFF (OR 2.51, p = 0.0002). Conclusions: Free flap reconstruction after pharyngolaryngectomy is reliable, with high flap survival rates. The JFF remains associated with lower rates of luminal complications, particularly in circumferential defects, while the ALT flap represents a valid alternative. Flap selection should be individualised, and further prospective studies with standardised outcomes are warranted.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellFree Tissue FlapsHypopharyngeal NeoplasmsLaryngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsHumansPharyngectomyTreatment Outcomehypopharyngeal cancerhypopharynxmicrosurgerymicrovascular free flapreconstructive surgery

Identifiers

PMID42153413
PMCPMC13189042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.