ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Foundation models and deep learning for cancer drug response prediction: a framework for data, metrics, and validation.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence of large-scale omics data and foundational models has renewed efforts in the field of cancer drug response prediction (DRP). Despite recent progress, challenges such as limited tumor heterogeneity in standard cell lines and inconsistencies in experimental protocols across studies persist. However, these challenges also open significant opportunities for innovation. The complex nature of drug responses, influenced by variations in new patients and new drugs, presents a critical area for advancing validation approaches that traditional machine learning approaches often overlook. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of DRP using advanced machine-learning models, discussing data sources, model designs, and evaluation methods. We introduce a unified framework for testing these models with a focus on clinically relevant metrics. By evaluating a range of foundational and deep-learning models within this framework, we identify performance gaps and propose concrete strategies to advance these computational models for reliable use in personalized cancer treatment, thereby unlocking their full clinical potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.