ReviewActa physiologica (Oxford, England)2026
Concept Cells and the Neural Bases of Human Memory.
Review in Acta physiologica (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- RIFT: A Fractal-Holographic Theory of Consciousness and Autopoietic Control.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-neuron recordings from the medial temporal lobe of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery have revealed "concept cells" that respond selectively and invariantly to meaningful stimuli such as specific people, places, or objects. These responses offer a unique window into how individual neurons encode high-level, multimodal representations-the building blocks of episodic memory-that differ from the more distributed, often hierarchical representations supporting semantic memory in the neocortex. Episodic and semantic memory, the systems for storing past experiences and conceptual knowledge, have traditionally been regarded as distinct. However, converging evidence from neuroimaging, lesion studies, and electrophysiological recordings challenges this strict dichotomy. This review synthesizes findings from human single-neuron recordings to re-examine the traditional distinction between episodic and semantic memory. We propose that the primary difference between the two systems lies in the structure of the associations they support: sparse, arbitrary links supporting episodic memory in the hippocampus versus ordered, hierarchical representations supporting semantic memory in the neocortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.