ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2026
Improved method for optical coherence tomography angiography: from reconstruction to clinical indicator quantification.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) represents a significant advance in noninvasive ophthalmic vascular imaging, yet existing reconstruction algorithms face challenges such as spectral leakage and motion artifacts, which can compromise image quality and the accuracy of subsequent clinical quantification. Improving OCTA reconstruction and developing robust, automated methods for clinical indicator extraction are crucial for enhancing diagnostic reliability and facilitating precise disease monitoring. Aim: We aim to propose and validate an improved OCTA reconstruction method based on a smoothed Walsh window function to reduce spectral leakage while preserving axial resolution, coupled with an enhanced blood flow B-scan signal using retinal layer segmentation. Furthermore, we seek to develop and evaluate a fully automated pipeline for calculating key clinical indicators-including foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters and vessel density-based on local fractal dimension analysis. Approach: A spectral-domain OCT system was used to acquire volumetric retinal data from healthy volunteers. The reconstruction method utilized a smoothed Walsh window for full-spectrum splitting to mitigate spectral leakage, combined with a deep learning-based retinal layer segmentation algorithm and Otsu's thresholding to enhance blood flow B-scan signals. For clinical quantification, local fractal dimension analysis was employed to segment vascular networks and FAZ regions automatically, from which perimeter, area, circularity index, and sectoral vessel density were computed. Results: The proposed reconstruction method demonstrated superior performance compared with traditional OMAG and SSADA algorithms, showing significant improvements in vessel connectivity, contrast (increase up to Conclusions: The integration of a smoothed Walsh window function and retinal layer segmentation significantly enhances OCTA image quality and blood flow signal clarity. The local fractal dimension-based automated analysis pipeline provides accurate, reproducible quantification of FAZ morphology and vessel density, demonstrating strong agreement with manual annotations. This method offers a reliable framework for improving both OCTA reconstruction and the automated derivation of clinical indicators, supporting advanced ophthalmic diagnosis and longitudinal disease assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.