ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Evaluating Interprofessional Education Competencies in Nursing and Pharmacy Students During an Interprofessional Problem-Based Learning Activity: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) is essential for preparing healthcare students to collaborate effectively in clinical practice. However, empirical evidence on IPE outcomes among nursing and pharmacy students in Saudi Arabia remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a structured interprofessional problem-based learning (PBL) activity on nursing and pharmacy students' interprofessional attitudes, teamwork behaviors, and knowledge in addition to exploring students' reflections on the learning experience. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 201 intermediate-level students at King Saud University. Students participated in a one-hour interprofessional PBL session built around a shared clinical case, preceded by a recorded briefing and ice-breaker activity. The following assessment strategies were employed: The Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS), the Individual Teamwork Observation and Feedback Tool (iTOFT), knowledge and retention assessments, and students' reflective evaluations of the experience. Results: IPAS scores indicated generally positive attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration, although lower scores in interprofessional bias suggested that some stereotypes persisted. iTOFT ratings showed high levels of effective teamwork. Thematic analysis of reflections revealed perceived gains in communication, understanding of roles and responsibilities, teamwork, and ethical practice. Students also identified challenges related to timing, group size, and logistical organization, and recommended clearer instructions, smaller groups, better scheduling, and inclusion of additional health professions. Knowledge scores were high immediately post-activity but showed a modest decline at three months, with one item related to understanding professional roles improving over time. Conclusion: A single, structured interprofessional PBL activity may foster positive interprofessional attitudes, support observable teamwork behaviors, and enhance understanding of professional roles. Nonetheless, residual biases, partial knowledge decay, and logistical challenges highlight the need for longitudinal, well-integrated IPE activities involving multiple disciplines. These findings may support the ongoing attempts for integration and enhancement of IPE within health professions curricula that may prepare students to better collaborative, and patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.