ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Operationalizing Trauma-Informed Principles to Build Safe, Inclusive, and Equitable Patient Partnerships in Pediatric Pain Research.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Questions for more insightful and useful analyses of barriers and facilitators to public involvement and engagement in health research: a critical narrative review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancing inclusion in pediatric pain research requires approaches that move beyond recruitment diversity toward authentic partnerships with youth and families whose lived experience can inform scientific rigor, relevance, and ethical integrity. Although patient engagement is widely endorsed, practical guidance for implementing partnerships that are safe, equitable, and sustainable remains limited, especially when working with populations exposed to intersectional marginalization and stigma. In this perspective, we argue that trauma-informed principles provide a critical framework for structuring meaningful patient partnerships in pediatric pain science. In collaboration with our patient partner (co-author, SS), we situate contemporary partnership approaches within their historical foundations in the justice-oriented movements that first recognized lived experience as a form of expertise. We then synthesize evidence describing benefits of patient engagement for research quality, feasibility, and translation, alongside emerging data on benefits for patient partners themselves. We use a case example from our lab to illustrate how patient partners can shape study design, language, recruitment, and ethical safeguards in ways that strengthen methodological and contextual validity. We also examine structural, relational, and emotional barriers that may limit equitable, rewarding participation if not intentionally addressed. In response to these barriers, we propose a partnership framework that links core trauma-informed care (TIC) principles (eg, safety, transparency/trustworthiness, peer support, collaboration, empowerment, cultural responsiveness) to actionable strategies and underlying mechanisms toward authentic engagement. We conclude inclusive partnership practices can help pediatric pain researchers to build collaborations that are ethically grounded, methodologically robust, and amplify the voices and priorities of youth living with pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.