Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42153013›Full record

ArticleAvicenna journal of phytomedicine

A preliminary pilot study of the effect of oatmeal and oxygen-ozone (O2-O3) administrations on NRF2 pathway-related antioxidants after intense exercise.

Sadegh Abbasian, Zohreh Mortezae, Mahsa Kargar Moghadam, Hamid Moghavemi, Hamed Ameri Afzadi, Mahboobeh Ghasemzadeh Rahbardar, Mohammad Ali Sardar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Avicenna journal of phytomedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sadegh AbbasianDepartment of Physical Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran.
Zohreh MortezaeDepartment of Sport Sciences, Khavaran Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran.
Mahsa Kargar MoghadamDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran.
Hamid MoghavemiDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Hamed Ameri AfzadiDepartment of Sport Sciences, Khavaran Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran.
Mahboobeh Ghasemzadeh RahbardarClinical Research Development Unit, Shahid Hasheminejad Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Ali SardarDepartment of General Courses, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This preliminary pilot study aimed to evaluate how oatmeal and oxygen-ozone (O Materials and Methods: A single-blind, repeated-measures design was conducted with ten participants (ages 20-36, body mass index<30 kg/m²) who completed high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) protocols under four conditions: baseline, following O Results: Significant fluctuations over time were observed in cardiovascular responses (p<0.05). Notably, cardiovascular responses following HIIE after supplementation differed compared to ozone sessions. Lactate, platelets, lymphocytes, and WBC increased significantly, while neutrophils decreased (p<0.05). glucose and most NRF2-related antioxidants remained stable; however, a gender-specific increase in superoxide dismutase (SOD) was found (p>0.05). Women showed a greater WBC reduction after oatmeal versus O Conclusion: The study demonstrated that oatmeal and O

Indexed as

AntioxidantsIntense exerciseNuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor-2 (NRF2)OatmealOxygen–ozoneWhite blood cells

Identifiers

PMID42153013
PMCPMC13180248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.